What makes a nation? What are its purposes? How do you know you
belong to it?
Though in this country we seem to
often confuse the word with terms like “across the nation” the true definition
of a nation has nothing to do with physical borders because it is the assembly
of a community. A nation is formed not with a pen or a map but out of
generations or even millennia of shared culture or ethnicity and decent. People
make nations from shared perspectives and a cultural camaraderie, rather than
with the express intent to govern or organize. This is not to say that the two
cannot go together. In the United States we have a history of forming a nation
out of a shared set of ideals about how a country should be governed and what relationship
citizens should have with their government. Ours is a nation whose common ties
are a set of ideas rather than ethnicity. For that we are an outlier, and I
believe, a fortunate one.
A nation itself in the technical
sense has no express purpose with formation. The formation is a phenomenon of
accident and human socialization that draws people together. Though as I said
above occasionally nations can be formed with purpose in mind. Our nation was
formed with the intent to create a governing system based on equality and
individual inalienable rights. I said above that I believe America to be
stronger for this. There are nations around the world that have specific ideals
as part of their national heritage: Iran’s national identity is based on rule of
law through religion, and Israel’s prioritizes a homeland for Jewish people
around the globe, however a nation itself does not need a goal or purpose to be
formed.
Inclusion in a nation I imagine in
their inceptions to be similarly informal, however today most national
identities are marked either by borders or by explicit cultural or hereditary
traits. In the US, as well as in several other nations fortunate enough to have
had control over their own borders, nations typically fit into countries quite
reliably. Though within our borders we also have distinct nations, specifically
the many different native tribes. In the cases of those nations not reinforced
by recognized legal barriers there are other means of “nation maintenance”,
typically culturally based, so that no member can be unsure of their
affiliation. This tendency
however, makes me reassess my earlier claim that the nation itself needs no
purpose. The pains taken to maintain nations and keep future generations from
straying seems to suggest a cross-national cause devoted to continuity. A
nation serves to self-preserve, protecting the identifying traits or beliefs
that cause individuals to join. Thus protecting every member’s highest regarded
personal tenants or qualities.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.