As
an immigrant, I have always thought of myself as a Jamaican first.
When I first arrived the simplest things seemed incredibly odd.
Something as ordinary as drinking orange juice for breakfast was
unusual. As a British descendent, we drink tea, like the Queen. Cold
substances are thought to give you stomach aches so early in the
morning. In general, I ascribed and still prefer my own Jamaican
culture first and foremost. I am of course very biased towards my own
culture which I suppose is the entire point of Anderson’s chapter on
Creole Pioneers. He discusses the struggle of how and what criteria
people should use to define their existence. Once they have done so,
the next question is to incorporate the various restriction imposed on
our identities by our social environment.
He
mentioned if the father was not in Spain when the child was born, he
would be considered creole. Even though in truth he may well be
otherwise indistinguishable from a regular privileged Spanish born
child. Anderson said, “Yet how irrational his exclusion must have
seemed.” I agree. To be excluded from an ancestry that one’s birth,
station and patriarchy tells you is yours based on your father’s
location. It seems ridiculous from my own perspective. I couldn’t
imagine how incredibly illogical it must have seemed to those men who
lived during that time. It is safe to say, for the amount of emphasis
given to one’s birthplace, other people who were fortunate enough did
not easily forgive this oversight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.