This is us.
This is
NOT us. Goes without saying really.
Imitation is the
highest form of flattery.
“If you don’t look
like me then there’s a problem.”-Dess
So I
walked into Sadler one day and saw a male friend, so I went over to hello. Mind
you, today was the day I decided I would show my hair which was in plaits. So I
said hello, he was sitting amongst a group of mutual friends. Our mutual friend
saw me first and said hello to me first. He noticed my hair and said oh you’re
showing your hair. Then the friend I had actually gone over to say hello to me
said saw my hair and was like Bu/Hon your hair is a mess, you need to go sort
out your hair! Incredibly shocked I decided to
take it as a joke and pretend I wasn’t offended. Seriously? A mess?
Really? Because none of the white people who saw it thought it was a mess. No
sir. Even an Asian friend of mine alongside another white friend said it looks
different. Funky. Nice, but different.
I
later learnt that it was the norm for girls in America, of African descent to
prefer to look like “Barbie dolls dipped in chocolate” than accept their
God-given natural hair. In London, England such notions of how a black women’s
hair should look and whether ones hair is in a “mess” is non-existent. Is it
the case that African-American girls are disproportionately influenced by
advertisements of white girls flicking their hair and letting the wind blowing
from side to side? Or is it because Beyoncé, Michelle Obama and other
African-American female actors all of a sudden are blest with European looking
hair? And so if the ordinary black African-American girl is not naturally
“blest” with such hair, they devise ways to bless themselves with such things. Why?
Whatever
the case may be , I am not ashamed of my hair. On the contrary I look at it
sometimes and think WoW, we (black) really do have the best hair. If only it
was longer so we could flick up and down and toss it from side to side like our
non-black counterparts. So we can show its beauty. Because it really is
beautiful. Straightening our hair or relaxing it or donning those odd horse-hair
wigs and those tracks and so on and so forth only helps destroy its true
beauty. If only our ideas on what true beauty weren’t so warped, so perverse,
we would see it for ourselves.
Dess
is right to say that most if not all African-American products are owned by
African-Americans interested after the welfare of African-American women’s
hair. If this is the case in America, I can confirm that it is even more the
case in London where most, if not all, the Afro hair shops are owned Asians.
One springs here and another there, all of them competing for loyal customers.
As good shop owners they know the brands well and are of the greatest help. But
do they know “our” hair? Do they even care? Rather do they stock up on what is
selling fast, because they know it is best for black hair or because they can
make a quick buck or two? Sadly, with great regret I think is the latter. For
like any shop owner or company, they seek profit, regardless of what is
happening to those who use it.
This
point brings me to the wonderful collage of black culture “The College Museum”
by George C Wolfe. Questions are raised
about identity, aim and purpose. This questions are raised aptly in Exhibit 6,
which brings up the question of hair. Note that the lady no longer had hair
because she had been changing her hairstyle like the changing seasons of the
year, now she was deciding whether she choose between an Afro wig from Taiwan
or straight white woman looking hair wig. In the end she doesn’t choose a
hairstyle, but choosing the straightened hair would have been a denouncement of
true black people’s hair because true black people’s hair ISN’T straight. My theory is every time
we as black people give in by bleaching ourselves and relaxing our hair in
order to pursue to “imitation” we are in fact helping bolster and support the
process of a lost identity.
I disagree. I believe that our hair is beautiful because of the many options we have in regards to what style we want. If I choose to get a weave, I'm a sellout? If I get a relaxer, I don't like myself? No, my sister, it is one's choice. It's not whether you decide to get a relaxer or rock a 'fro, its that you are taking care of yourself and tending to your appearance. It's the fact that you don't just get up in the morning and go without even giving your appearance a second thought. As long as you are clean and pleased with the you, that you are presenting to the world.
ReplyDeleteIn conclusion, think a girl should be able to do WHATEVER she wants to do with her hair, without being judged as being ashamed of who she is or neglecting her heritage or anything like that, as long as its intentional.
Nish, I disagree with you.
DeleteI feel, and having talked to some girls here about hair, there is this drive to have your hair relaxed no question and it stems from the notion that 'you can do more with it being relaxed'.
Relaxing ones hair does nothing but damage it. But girls here seem to have a desire to do it regardless to 'fit into a stereotype'.
You only have to look around this campus to see what I am talking about. Tell me, how many black girls here have not relaxed their hair? Still have their natural curls? Look natural? Because I can confirm I am watching and I can tell you I can count them with one hand!
Isn't this enough a reason to make any girl who comes here from the UK think they are an oddity because their hair is natural? Because I think it is.
If you choose to get a weave that is your choice, but why are you getting a weave? Why don't you appreciate and attend to the hair the good Lord has already given you?
If you get your hair relaxed then yes I would say you don't like yourself because you are damaging your hair and one only "self-harms" if they don't like themselves!
Yes, it is your choice to do whatever you like but the truth must be said when it needs to be said. RELAXER IS NOT GOOD, IT NEVER HAS BEEN!
What is taking care of your hair? Because in America its seems taking care of ones hair means relaxing it, as my friend in the story was pointing out to me. That is what he classified as "taking care of ones hair". It's ironic because in fact one is damaging their hair by relaxing it.
It is done to give the appearance of white people's hair (permanently straight). By relaxing ones hair you get rid of the natural curls that we black girls were born with. You don't get the curls back unless you get rid of your relaxed hair. This seems to be considered the normal way to take care of your hair nowadays in America.
Girls here just relax their hair nowadays not knowing there was a reason why relaxation started. The same reason bleaching creams started. Because people were not happy with their natural look. So is bleaching considered "taking care of ones appearance too"?
A girl should be able to do whatever she wants with her hair, without being judged or being ashamed of it. Agreed. But that will not stop me highlighting that girls should exercise some caution as to what they do when they decide to "take care of themselves".