To quote the title of one of Audre Lorde’s famous essays, “The
Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House”. The trick to
colonialism is that it makes this appear to be untrue. As we covered in class,
the oppressed group comes to adopt the “tools” of their oppression. We observed
this in Amigo. Religion is prescribed
to the Fillipino women. It appears to provide an “outlet”. We discussed in
class how this relationship is also an avenue of sexual exploitation, however.
Instead of looking abroad, I think that we can find examples of
anticipatory strategies within the boundaries of our own nation. For instance,
we can consider the oppression of women’s sexuality. Starting an early age in
our country, gender is made explicit to both women and men. Health courses,
including the one my own school provided, are predominantly heterosexual and
exclude several options of birth control. Abstinence programs and poor sex
education disadvantage millions of women. Many women believe that this tactic
is actually an exercise in agency. Education is preemptively withheld from the marginalized
group. I have met women who hold this belief and postulate that access to sex
education materials and birth control for young women especially is a form of
oppression. What I argue is that patriarchy has been such an established
institution in our country for so long that women have come to adopt its ideology
and now express their independence using the “master’s tools”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.