I think that while there can be a vast difference between
the public and the private, in today’s world, the two are becoming more and
more converged. While this can, in some cases, facilitate nation and community
building, it can also lead to negative outcomes. For example, we learn from
Anderson about the role the printing press played in nation building and
bringing people closer together. Here, we see something that used to be
concealed, or somewhat private (the texts), now becoming public on a very large
scale. In this case, this allowed people to feel connected with one another, share
thoughts and ideas, and spread nationalism. Another example of this is the Arab
Spring, in which people took their hatred of their leaders, which had
previously only been private for fear of going to jail or worse, and made those
thoughts public through protests and over social media. Here you see
nation/community building thanks to the convergence of the private and the
public.
However, there is another side to this. In today’s world,
things that used to be private, such as a diary or personal photographs, can
now easily be sharedn with millions of people with the click of a button. Again,
this can play a role facilitating nation building, as it can let you connect
and feel closer to your community or your nation, however sometimes the things
that are moving from the private to the public space can lead to trouble for
the owner of those materials. For example, we’ve seen many news stories
recently of photos of rape incidents being leaked online, and leading to
life-changing detrimental outcomes for both the victim and the perpetrator(s).
While this is good because it can lead to justice for those who committed the
crime, it can also lead to very negative emotional outcomes for those innocent
people who have had something very private now made extremely public.
Another instance where we see this effect is when people
share their views (taking them from private to public) and can get in a lot of trouble.
This makes me think of a recent new story of two teenage girls who posted an
extremely racist rant on youtube, and faced a lot of backlash, including death
threats, because of it. We also see this with people being scrutinized because
of thing posted on their social media pages, possibly losing out on a job or an
acceptance to a university because of it. But the truth behind that is that there
are probably other candidates who do the same things (whether it be party, use
foul language, etc.) but they simply kept it in the private rather than sharing
it with the public.
So where is the halfway line? It is good to share things
because we want to be part of communities and nations, and also sharing can
help open one’s soul and mind. However, clearly there can be negative
consequences of putting things into the public sphere, and once they are they,
they can never be taken back. So how much do we share, and how much do we keep
private? Today, unlike in the past, there is literally no limit on how much of
yourself you can share, but how much you will
share is certainly puzzling.



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.